IELTS.WORK

IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - The following is a potential from an exam

IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1713383433

The following is a potential Writing Task 2 topic from an IELTS exam:

"Some people argue that carbon trading is an effective strategy for reducing emissions; others disagree. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion."

Here's a model answer for this topic:

Carbon trading, also known as cap-and-trade, has been suggested as a means to tackle the problem of rising greenhouse gas emissions. Proponents argue that it is an effective strategy because it allows industries to reduce their carbon footprint in a cost-effective manner by providing financial incentives for reducing emissions. Critics, however, contend that carbon trading may not always lead to genuine reductions in emissions and can result in the transfer of pollution from one area to another. In this essay, I will analyze both these views and provide my own perspective on the matter.

On one hand, proponents of carbon trading argue that it is an effective strategy for reducing emissions because it imposes a financial cost on industries for emitting greenhouse gases. This cost encourages companies to seek out ways to reduce their emissions in order to save money. Moreover, by setting a cap on the total amount of allowed emissions, the system ensures that overall emissions levels decrease over time. Additionally, carbon trading can spur innovation in clean energy technologies as industries are incentivized to find more sustainable methods of production.

On the other hand, critics of carbon trading argue that it may not always lead to genuine reductions in emissions. They assert that companies may simply purchase allowances instead of investing in emission-reduction projects, effectively outsourcing their environmental responsibilities. Furthermore, it is possible for pollution to be transferred from one area to another if a company with excess allowances sells them to another company located in an area with lax regulations or enforcement. Consequently, this may result in no overall reduction of emissions at the national or global level.

In conclusion, carbon trading can indeed be an effective strategy for reducing emissions in certain circumstances. However, it is crucial that a robust regulatory framework is put in place to prevent industries from exploiting loopholes and ensure that genuine reductions are achieved. While carbon trading has the potential to be a powerful tool in the fight against climate change, its efficacy ultimately depends on the commitment of governments, businesses, and individuals to act responsibly and work together towards a sustainable future.

Based on this model answer, the following scores can be assigned according to IELTS scoring standards:

- Task Response (6): The candidate has fully addressed all parts of the task, demonstrating a comprehensive understanding of the topic.
- Coherence and Cohesion (7): The essay is well organized with clear, logical progression from one point to another, and effective cohesive devices are used throughout the text.
- Lexical Resource (6.5): The candidate demonstrates a broad range of vocabulary, although there may be some repetition or less common lexical choices.
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy (7): The essay displays a high level of grammatical accuracy, with only a few minor errors that do not impede understanding.
- Presentation of Ideas (6.5): The candidate has used appropriate discourse markers to connect ideas and ensure the text flows smoothly.

Source: https://www.ielts.work/?id=1713383433&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more: https://www.ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice