IELTS.WORK

IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Should governments provide universal access to education beyond high school?

IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1713327311

IELTS Writing Task 2 Topic: Should governments provide universal access to education beyond high school?

Model Answer:
In recent years, there has been an increasing emphasis on the importance of education as a means to improve social and economic conditions. With this in mind, many people argue that governments should provide universal access to education beyond high school, which includes tertiary education such as colleges and universities. However, others contend that it is not the responsibility of the government to fund higher education for all. In this essay, I will discuss both sides of the argument and ultimately conclude that providing universal access to education beyond high school should be a priority for governments around the world.

On one hand, there are several compelling reasons why governments should consider funding higher education for all citizens. Firstly, education is an essential tool in combating poverty and inequality. When people have access to quality education, they are better equipped to find well-paying jobs, thereby reducing their reliance on government assistance. Additionally, a more educated population can contribute to economic growth by fostering innovation and technological advancements. For example, the United States saw a significant boost in its economy after the implementation of the GI Bill, which provided funding for veterans to attend university.

Moreover, investing in higher education is an investment in the future workforce. As the world continues to become more competitive, it is crucial that governments produce graduates who are capable of contributing to their country's economic growth and global competitiveness. By providing universal access to education beyond high school, governments can help ensure a skilled workforce that will drive innovation and sustainability.

On the other hand, opponents of universal access argue that it is not the responsibility of the government to fund higher education for all citizens. They contend that individuals should be responsible for financing their own education, as this encourages self-reliance and independence. Furthermore, they assert that governments should prioritize funding essential services such as healthcare and infrastructure rather than tertiary education.

In conclusion, while it is understandable that some argue against government funding of higher education, the benefits of providing universal access to education beyond high school far outweigh the drawbacks. Governments should prioritize investing in their citizens' education, as this not only leads to a more skilled workforce but also contributes to overall social and economic development. Ultimately, ensuring that everyone has the opportunity to pursue higher education is a worthwhile investment for governments across the globe.

Score: Band 9

Source: https://www.ielts.work/?id=1713327311&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more: https://www.ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice