IELTS.WORK

IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Should cultural institutions repatriate stolen artifacts?

IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1713276136

Topic: "Should cultural institutions repatriate stolen artifacts?"

Model Answer:
In recent years, there has been an ongoing debate about whether or not cultural institutions should repatriate, or return, stolen artifacts to their countries of origin. Some argue that repatriation is the moral and ethically correct course of action, while others contend that these artifacts have become an integral part of the museum's collection and should remain where they are. This essay will discuss both viewpoints, presenting arguments for and against repatriation, and ultimately conclude with a recommendation.

One of the main arguments in favor of repatriation is the moral and ethical obligation to return artifacts that have been unjustly taken from their original locations. These artifacts often hold immense historical and cultural significance for the people from whom they were stolen, and their return can help preserve and celebrate these cultural identities. Furthermore, many believe that cultural institutions in the West have an obligation to right the wrongs of colonialism and imperialism by returning these artifacts to their rightful owners.

On the other hand, there are those who argue that repatriation may not always be the best course of action. For instance, it is important to consider the current state of preservation and conservation of these artifacts. If an artifact has been in a cultural institution for many years, it may have undergone extensive research, restoration, or conservation efforts that would not be available in its country of origin. Removing the artifact from this safe environment could potentially lead to damage or loss.

Additionally, proponents of keeping these artifacts argue that they serve an important educational function in their current locations. They claim that, by studying and analyzing artifacts from various cultures, people can gain a better understanding of world history and foster a sense of global citizenship. In this way, the artifact's presence in a museum might actually help to promote cultural exchange and respect, rather than hinder it.

In conclusion, while there are valid arguments on both sides of the debate, the ethical obligation to return stolen artifacts to their countries of origin ultimately outweighs any potential benefits they may provide in their current locations. Repatriation can help to correct past wrongs and promote a sense of cultural pride and identity for those from whom these artifacts were taken. Cultural institutions should prioritize repatriation, taking care to ensure that the artifacts are properly preserved and cared for upon their return.

Score: Band 8.5 (Overall argument is clear, logical, and well-supported with relevant examples and evidence. There may be minor errors in grammar and vocabulary usage.)

Source: https://www.ielts.work/?id=1713276136&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more: https://www.ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice