IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - QuestionThe role of NonGovernmental Organizations (NGOs) in addressing social issues has become increasingly significant in recent years. Some argue that NGOs are better equipped than governments to tackle complex problems such as poverty, human rights abuses and environmental degradation. Others claim that the effectiveness of these organizations is often overstated, and that it is the responsibility of governments to ensure the welfare of their citizens.
IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1713263211
Question:The role of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) in addressing social issues has become increasingly significant in recent years. Some argue that NGOs are better equipped than governments to tackle complex problems such as poverty, human rights abuses and environmental degradation. Others claim that the effectiveness of these organizations is often overstated, and that it is the responsibility of governments to ensure the welfare of their citizens.
Discuss both these viewpoints and give your own opinion on whether NGOs or governments are more effective in addressing social issues.
Model Answer:
In recent years, the role of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) in addressing social issues has grown significantly. Some people believe that these organizations have a more vital part to play in solving problems such as poverty, human rights abuses, and environmental degradation than governments themselves. However, others maintain that the effectiveness of NGOs is frequently exaggerated and that it is the duty of governments to ensure the welfare of their citizens. In this essay, I will discuss both these viewpoints before presenting my own opinion on which entity – NGOs or governments – are more effective in addressing social issues.
Firstly, it can be argued that NGOs possess a unique advantage when dealing with social issues. These organizations tend to be smaller and less bureaucratic than governmental bodies, allowing them to act quickly and adapt easily to changing circumstances. For example, during natural disasters or outbreaks of disease, NGOs are often the first responders on the ground, providing immediate aid and support to those in need. Additionally, NGOs can mobilize resources and expertise from around the world, something that governments may struggle to achieve due to political constraints and bureaucratic red tape.
However, it is also important to consider the role of governments in addressing social issues. Governments have a responsibility to protect their citizens' rights and ensure their well-being. They possess the power to enact laws and regulations, allocate resources, and coordinate national responses to complex problems. For example, only governments can create and enforce policies that address systemic inequality or implement large-scale environmental initiatives. In many cases, NGOs rely on government support to carry out their work, highlighting the interdependence between these two sectors.
In my opinion, both NGOs and governments have a vital role to play in addressing social issues. While NGOs can act quickly and adaptably in response to specific problems, governments are responsible for setting overarching policies and ensuring that all citizens' needs are met. The most effective approach is likely one of collaboration between these two sectors, with each focusing on the areas where they excel. By working together, NGOs and governments can ensure a more comprehensive and coordinated response to social issues, ultimately benefiting everyone involved.
In conclusion, while it is true that both NGOs and governments have a role in addressing social issues, their respective strengths and weaknesses mean that they are most effective when they work together. Governments should recognize the value of NGOs' expertise and flexibility, while NGOs must understand the importance of governmental support and coordination. This cooperative approach will lead to a more efficient and effective response to social issues, ultimately benefiting all citizens.
Band Score:
9
Task Response: 5 (The essay responds fully to the task requirements by analyzing both viewpoints in detail and presenting the writer's own opinion.)
Coherence and Cohesion:
6 (The essay is well-structured and logically organized, with a clear sequence of ideas. However, there are some minor areas where coherence could be improved.)
Lexical Resource:
7 (The vocabulary used is varied and accurate, but occasionally the writer's choices are somewhat simplistic or redundant.)
Grammar:
8 (The grammar is mostly accurate, but there are a few minor errors that slightly affect clarity.)
Pronunciation: N/
Source:
https://www.ielts.work/?id=1713263211&page=ielts-writing-practice
For more:
https://www.ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice
