IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Should governments provide universal access to clean water?
IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1713250514
IELTS Writing Task 2 Topic:Should governments provide universal access to clean water?
Model Answer:
In recent years, the issue of providing universal access to clean water has gained significant attention worldwide. This topic is highly relevant in today's context, as millions of people still lack access to this basic necessity. Governments around the world have been debating whether they should take on the responsibility of ensuring that every citizen has access to clean water. In this essay, I will discuss the arguments for and against government provision of universal access to clean water, and present my own opinion on the matter.
On one hand, there are strong reasons in favor of government intervention in this area. Firstly, providing clean water is essential for maintaining public health. Contaminated water can lead to the spread of diseases such as cholera, dysentery, and typhoid, causing serious health consequences and even death. By ensuring universal access to clean water, governments can significantly reduce the prevalence of these waterborne illnesses and improve the overall health of their citizens.
Secondly, access to clean water is a fundamental human right, as recognized by the United Nations. This means that every person should have the right to an adequate standard of living, including access to clean water. Governments are responsible for protecting and promoting these rights, and providing clean water to all citizens aligns with this duty.
On the other hand, some argue against government intervention in this area. One argument is that it is more efficient for private companies to provide clean water rather than governments. Private organizations may have more resources, expertise, and flexibility to manage water supply systems effectively, ensuring that they are sustainable and cost-effective. In addition, these companies can be held accountable by consumers through market mechanisms, which could lead to better service provision.
Moreover, critics of government intervention point out that there might be better ways for governments to allocate their resources. For example, they could focus on improving education, healthcare, or infrastructure instead of providing clean water, as these areas have a more significant impact on the overall quality of life and well-being of citizens.
In conclusion, while there are valid arguments against government provision of universal access to clean water, it is crucial to recognize that access to clean water is not only essential for public health but also a fundamental human right. Governments should prioritize this issue by collaborating with private companies and utilizing innovative solutions to ensure that every citizen has access to clean water. Ultimately, the well-being and dignity of millions of people depend on the provision of this basic necessity.
Score:
Band 7.5
Source:
https://www.ielts.work/?id=1713250514&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more:
https://www.ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice
