IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Some people argue that schools should offer classes on media literacy and critical thinking, while others believe this is unnecessary. Discuss both sides of the argument and give your own opinion.
IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1713208464
Task 2 Writing: Some people argue that schools should offer classes on media literacy and critical thinking, while others believe this is unnecessary. Discuss both sides of the argument and give your own opinion.
Model Answer:
Media literacy and critical thinking are essential skills in today's world, where information is widely available through various channels such as television, radio, newspapers, and social media. The proponents of offering these classes in schools argue that students need to be equipped with the necessary tools to navigate the vast amount of information and develop an understanding of how media works. On the other hand, opponents believe that media literacy and critical thinking can be developed through natural learning processes and everyday experiences.
One argument in favor of incorporating media literacy and critical thinking classes into the curriculum is the increasing influence of mass media on society. With the rise of social media platforms and the internet, people are exposed to an overwhelming amount of information daily. This exposure can lead to confusion and misinformation if individuals lack the skills to evaluate the credibility and reliability of sources. Media literacy classes would teach students how to analyze media messages, understand the role of media in society, and develop the critical thinking skills necessary to make informed decisions based on accurate information.
Another point in favor of offering these classes is that media messages can sometimes be biased or manipulated. For instance, news articles and television programs may present a particular perspective or agenda, which could potentially mislead individuals into forming incorrect beliefs. Media literacy education would teach students to recognize such biases and develop an understanding of how media outlets can shape public opinion.
However, opponents of these classes argue that critical thinking skills can be developed through natural learning processes and everyday experiences. They believe that students should focus on mastering core subjects such as mathematics, science, and literature, which are essential for academic success and future careers. Media literacy and critical thinking skills can be cultivated outside the classroom setting, they say, through exposure to various media channels and engaging in discussions with others.
Furthermore, opponents assert that incorporating these classes into the curriculum may lead to an overcrowded syllabus, which could negatively impact students' performance in other subjects. They argue that schools should focus on enhancing students' core competencies instead of expanding their scope to include media literacy and critical thinking education.
In conclusion, while it is essential for students to develop media literacy and critical thinking skills, schools need to strike a balance between offering these classes and maintaining the focus on core subjects. By integrating these topics into the existing curriculum or providing extracurricular activities that emphasize these skills, schools can prepare their students for an increasingly complex and interconnected world without sacrificing their mastery of essential academic knowledge.
Overall, the argument presents a balanced view of both sides and is well-structured, making it deserving of a
Band Score 7 or
8 in an IELTS Writing Test.
Source:
https://www.ielts.work/?id=1713208464&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more:
https://www.ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice
