IELTS.WORK

IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Should governments provide universal access to education beyond high school?

IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1712938578

IELTS Writing Task 2 Topic: Should governments provide universal access to education beyond high school?

Model Answer:
In recent years, there has been a growing debate about whether governments should provide universal access to education beyond high school. While some argue that it is crucial for the development of individuals and societies, others believe that this responsibility should lie with families and private institutions. In this essay, I will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of providing universal access to higher education, as well as consider whether it should be a governmental obligation.

On one hand, there are several compelling reasons why governments should ensure universal access to education beyond high school. Firstly, higher education has been shown to have a significant impact on an individual's earning potential and career prospects. Those with tertiary qualifications tend to earn more over their lifetime and have greater opportunities for career advancement. This not only benefits the individual but also contributes to economic growth and social mobility within a nation.

Secondly, education plays a crucial role in fostering critical thinking, creativity, and innovation. By providing access to higher education, governments can help create a more informed and skilled workforce that is better equipped to tackle the challenges of the 21st century, such as climate change, technological advancements, and globalization.

However, there are also arguments against government-funded universal access to higher education. One major concern is the cost of providing this level of education to all citizens. Governments may need to invest heavily in expanding universities, hiring more faculty, and developing new curricula to accommodate a larger student body. This could divert funding from other essential services, such as healthcare or infrastructure development.

Another argument against universal access is that it may reduce the quality of education if resources are spread too thinly across a larger number of students. Critics also argue that individuals and families should have the freedom to choose their own educational paths, rather than being compelled by government mandate.

In conclusion, while there are valid reasons for providing universal access to education beyond high school, it is essential to consider the potential drawbacks and weigh these against the benefits. Governments must carefully assess how such a policy would impact their citizens and the nation as a whole, taking into account the financial implications and the potential trade-offs in terms of quality. Ultimately, the decision should be based on a comprehensive analysis of the pros and cons to ensure that all individuals have an equal opportunity to succeed and contribute to a thriving society.

Score: Band 7 - The essay presents a clear position on the topic, with well-structured arguments and examples. There may be some grammatical or lexical errors, but they do not significantly impact the overall understanding of the essay's message.

Source: https://www.ielts.work/?id=1712938578&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more: https://www.ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice