IELTS.WORK

IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Should governments prioritize conservation over economic development?

IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1712852363

IELTS Writing Task 2 Topic: Should governments prioritize conservation over economic development?

Model Answer:

In recent years, the world has faced numerous environmental challenges, including climate change, deforestation, and loss of biodiversity. These issues have led to a growing debate about whether governments should prioritize conservation over economic development. While it is true that economic growth is essential for improving the quality of life and reducing poverty, it is also important to consider the long-term consequences of unchecked expansion on our environment.

In this essay, I will argue that governments should prioritize conservation efforts in order to protect the natural resources that are crucial for human survival. One of the main reasons for prioritizing conservation over economic development is the need to preserve biodiversity. The world's ecosystems are interconnected, and each species plays a unique role in maintaining the balance of nature. For example, bees pollinate plants, which provide food for other animals, and in turn, these animals help control insect populations. By prioritizing conservation, governments can protect the delicate balance of these ecosystems and ensure that they remain healthy and functional for future generations.

Another reason for prioritizing conservation is the importance of preserving natural resources for future generations. Fossil fuels, forests, and water are all essential resources that we depend on for our daily lives. If these resources are depleted due to uncontrolled economic development, it could lead to significant environmental damage and social unrest. By prioritizing conservation, governments can help ensure the long-term sustainability of these vital resources, which will benefit not only the environment but also future generations who depend on them.

However, some argue that prioritizing conservation over economic development would hinder progress and exacerbate poverty. While it is true that rapid economic growth can help reduce poverty in the short term, it is important to recognize that a sustainable economy relies on a healthy environment. If governments focus solely on short-term economic gains, they may overlook the long-term consequences of environmental degradation. For example, deforestation for agriculture may provide short-term benefits, but it can lead to soil erosion and loss of biodiversity in the long run. By prioritizing conservation, governments can create a more sustainable economy that benefits both people and the environment.

In conclusion, while economic development is essential for improving the quality of life and reducing poverty, governments should also prioritize conservation efforts to protect the natural resources on which human survival depends. By taking a balanced approach that considers both short-term economic gains and long-term environmental consequences, governments can ensure a sustainable future for all.

Score: Band 8.5 - This model answer presents a well-structured and coherent argument, with clear explanations and examples to support the main points. The language used is advanced, and the essay effectively addresses both sides of the debate, ultimately advocating for a balanced approach that considers both conservation and economic development.

Source: https://www.ielts.work/?id=1712852363&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more: https://www.ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice