IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Should governments invest in public transportation to reduce car emissions?
IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1712655596
Topic: "Should governments invest in public transportation to reduce car emissions?"
Question Structures Aligning with Real IELTS Testing:
1. What are the main reasons for governments investing in public transportation to reduce car emissions?
2. Explain some of the benefits and drawbacks associated with increased investment in public transportation systems.
3. Discuss the extent to which improving public transportation can have a significant impact on reducing car emissions, and suggest any alternative solutions that could be implemented by governments.
4. In your own words, briefly summarize the main points from your essay, and explain why you think your viewpoint is the most valid or logical one.
Model Answer for Writing Topic:
In recent times, the rapid rise in car emissions has become a major global concern, with governments worldwide seeking effective solutions to mitigate this environmental issue. One such solution proposed by many is investment in public transportation. This essay will discuss the reasons behind investing in public transport, its benefits and drawbacks, and suggest alternative measures that can be taken to reduce car emissions.
The primary reason for governments to invest in public transportation is to decrease reliance on private vehicles, which are the main contributors to greenhouse gas emissions. As more people use public transport, the number of cars on the road reduces, leading to a decline in carbon dioxide and nitrogen oxide levels. Furthermore, promoting sustainable modes of transport, such as buses, trains, and trams, can help to reduce traffic congestion and improve overall air quality.
Investing in public transportation has its benefits, including reduced greenhouse gas emissions, improved traffic flow, and enhanced accessibility for those who cannot afford or are unable to use private vehicles. However, it is also essential to consider the potential drawbacks of such investment. For instance, initial capital costs can be quite high, and there may be resistance from citizens who prefer their cars due to factors such as comfort, flexibility, and convenience.
Despite these challenges, improving public transportation systems can significantly impact reducing car emissions. Governments could implement policies that encourage the use of public transport, such as offering incentives for users or imposing congestion charges on drivers. Additionally, investing in research and development of cleaner energy sources for public vehicles, such as electric buses and trains, would also contribute to the reduction of emissions.
Alternative solutions to reducing car emissions include promoting carpooling schemes, cycling initiatives, and supporting the use of electric or hybrid cars. Governments could provide incentives for citizens to adopt these practices through tax breaks, subsidies, and infrastructure development.
In conclusion, while investing in public transportation offers a viable solution to reduce car emissions, it is essential to consider all potential alternatives and implement a comprehensive approach that encompasses a range of sustainable transport options. The most valid viewpoint, in my opinion, would be one that acknowledges the interconnectedness of various measures and emphasizes the need for a multi-faceted strategy that addresses the root causes of car emissions and promotes overall environmental sustainability.
Score Analysis:
Task Response: 5 (The essay fully answers all parts of the question, demonstrating a comprehensive understanding of the topic.)
Coherence and Cohesion: 5 (The essay is well-structured and logically organized, with smooth transitions between paragraphs.)
Lexical Resource:
6 (The essay uses a wide range of vocabulary, though some less common terms may not be entirely accurate or appropriate in this context. Some phrases are repetitive, but the overall lexical resource is sufficient for a
Band 6 score.)
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 5 (There are no major grammatical errors that impact understanding, but there are some minor errors that may affect the accuracy of expression or slightly reduce coherence. Overall, the grammar is accurate and appropriate for a
Band 5 score.)
Presentation of Ideas:
6 (The essay presents clear and logical arguments and provides relevant examples to support its points. While the presentation is generally strong, there are some areas where the language could be more concise or precise.)
Overall
Score: 5.
8
Source:
https://www.ielts.work/?id=1712655596&page=ielts-writing-practice
For more:
https://www.ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice
