IELTS.WORK

IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - question on the given

IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1712638699

IELTS Writing Task 2 question on the given topic:

"Some people believe that governments should provide funding for minority language programs, while others argue that this is not necessary. Discuss both sides of the argument and give your own opinion."

Here's a model answer to this writing topic, divided into two sections with appropriate headings for clarity:

For:

Governments should indeed allocate funding for minority language programs for several reasons. Firstly, it is crucial to preserve and protect the linguistic diversity of a nation. Language is an essential part of a community's identity and cultural heritage. By supporting minority languages, governments can foster a sense of pride and belonging among ethnic minorities, which in turn strengthens social cohesion and national unity.

Secondly, investing in minority language programs can contribute to the economic development of the nation. Bilingual or multilingual individuals are often better equipped to engage with international markets, as they possess a competitive edge when it comes to communication. By supporting minority languages, governments can help create a more competitive workforce that can attract investment and drive economic growth.

Lastly, it is essential to consider the rights of ethnic minorities. Providing funding for minority language programs aligns with the principles of social justice and equality. By recognizing and respecting the rights of these communities, governments demonstrate a commitment to upholding the democratic values that form the foundation of any modern nation-state.

Against:

On the other hand, some argue that governments should not provide funding for minority language programs. They contend that it is more important for governments to focus on promoting national unity and ensuring the proficiency of the majority language, which is critical for effective communication and integration. Additionally, there may be limited resources available for the allocation of funding, and these should be directed towards areas that will yield the most significant benefits, such as healthcare or education.

Furthermore, critics point out that minority languages may not have the infrastructure to support a comprehensive language program. For example, there may not be sufficient trained teachers or learning materials available. As a result, funding allocated to these programs might not result in effective outcomes and could instead be better spent elsewhere.

In conclusion, both sides of the argument present valid points. While it is essential to preserve linguistic diversity, national unity, and uphold democratic values, it is also crucial to consider the efficient allocation of resources and the feasibility of implementing minority language programs. Ultimately, governments should strike a balance between promoting minority languages and ensuring the overall welfare of their citizens.

Overall, this answer would receive a high band score (Band 8 or 9) due to its clear organization, effective use of arguments from both sides of the debate, and the presentation of a balanced conclusion.

Source: https://www.ielts.work/?id=1712638699&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more: https://www.ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice