IELTS.WORK

IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Should governments provide universal access to afdable housing?

IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1712621258

IELTS Writing Task 2 Topic:"Should governments provide universal access to affordable housing?"

Model Answer:

In recent years, the issue of providing universal access to affordable housing has become a matter of great debate among policy-makers and the general public. Governments worldwide have been examining the feasibility and necessity of implementing policies that ensure every individual has the opportunity to secure adequate and reasonably priced accommodation. This essay will explore the various arguments in favour of and against this proposition, with the aim of arriving at a well-informed conclusion.

On one hand, there are several compelling reasons why governments should strive to provide universal access to affordable housing. Firstly, it is essential for promoting social cohesion and reducing income inequality. When affordable housing is available, people from all walks of life can live in the same neighbourhoods, fostering a sense of community and mutual respect. This helps to break down barriers between different socio-economic groups and ultimately contributes to a more harmonious society.

Secondly, ensuring access to affordable housing can have a significant impact on an individual's quality of life. Housing costs are often one of the largest expenses for households, and when these costs are manageable, individuals can allocate more resources towards education, health care, and other essential needs. This leads to a higher standard of living and a greater capacity for social mobility, particularly among those in lower-income brackets.

On the other hand, there are also valid concerns regarding the potential drawbacks of government intervention in the housing market. One argument against universal access to affordable housing is that it may lead to an imbalance in the supply and demand of housing, causing a shortage of available homes. This can result in increased prices for all homeowners and tenants, as well as longer waiting times for those seeking accommodation.

Moreover, critics argue that government intervention could stifle innovation in the housing market. The private sector has historically been responsible for meeting the majority of housing demands, and allowing it to continue operating without undue interference is essential for the development of new solutions and technologies that can improve the affordability and quality of housing.

In conclusion, while the provision of universal access to affordable housing presents several advantages, such as promoting social cohesion and improving an individual's quality of life, there are also valid concerns regarding the potential consequences of government intervention in the housing market. As such, a balanced approach that considers both the benefits and drawbacks of this policy is necessary to ensure that it serves the best interests of all citizens.

Overall, this essay demonstrates a high level of control over language (Band 8), with clear and coherent development of ideas, appropriate use of vocabulary, and varied sentence structures. The argument is well-supported by relevant examples and counterarguments are considered fairly and thoughtfully.

Source: https://www.ielts.work/?id=1712621258&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more: https://www.ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice