IELTS.WORK

IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Should Governments Provide Free Public Transportation?

IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1712511144

Topic: "Should Governments Provide Free Public Transportation?"

Model Answer:
In recent years, the debate over whether or not governments should provide free public transportation has gained significant traction. On one hand, proponents argue that it would improve accessibility and reduce inequality; while opponents claim that it could lead to an increase in congestion and misuse of resources. In this essay, I will examine both sides of the argument before presenting my conclusion.

Firstly, providing free public transportation can help to create a more equitable society by giving everyone equal access to essential services. Currently, those who cannot afford expensive car ownership or private transport services are often disadvantaged in terms of mobility and opportunities. By removing the financial barrier, free public transportation would enable these individuals to travel more easily for work, education, healthcare appointments, and other essential activities. This would ultimately lead to a reduction in social inequality as everyone has an equal opportunity to access resources regardless of their economic status.

However, opponents argue that offering free public transport could result in increased congestion due to the higher number of users. Public transportation systems are already struggling to accommodate existing passengers efficiently; adding more riders without increasing capacity may exacerbate overcrowding issues. As a result, journey times would increase and create further strain on an already stretched system. Additionally, there is a concern that free transport could be misused by individuals who take advantage of the system for leisure purposes rather than using it for necessary journeys.

Furthermore, some critics argue that taxpayer funds should not be used to subsidize public transportation as this money could be allocated elsewhere, such as improving healthcare or education systems. They contend that implementing free transport would place an unnecessary burden on the state's budget and divert funding away from other vital services.

In conclusion, while providing free public transportation has the potential to improve accessibility and reduce inequality, it is important to consider the potential downsides, such as increased congestion and misuse of resources. Ultimately, governments need to carefully weigh up the benefits against the costs before deciding whether or not to implement this policy.

For Task Response (3): This essay effectively presents an overview of both sides of the debate on whether or not governments should provide free public transportation. It discusses issues such as improving accessibility and reducing inequality, but also acknowledges potential drawbacks like increased congestion and misuse of resources. The essay concludes by suggesting that governments must carefully weigh up the pros and cons before making any decisions.

For Coherence and Cohesion (4): This response is coherent as it presents a logical progression of ideas. The argument is structured with clear topic sentences, leading to a strong conclusion. There are no glaring errors in grammar or punctuation that would hinder comprehension.

For Lexical Resource (3.5): Vocabulary usage is generally appropriate and varied, demonstrating a good level of English language competency. However, some sentences contain overly complex constructions which may detract from clarity slightly.

Source: https://www.ielts.work/?id=1712511144&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more: https://www.ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice