IELTS.WORK

IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Should governments provide free public transportation?

IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1712447473

Topic: "Should governments provide free public transportation?"

Model Answer:

In recent years, there has been a growing debate about whether or not governments should provide free public transportation. Advocates of this proposal argue that it would reduce air pollution, ease traffic congestion, and promote social equity. On the other hand, opponents claim that it could result in increased budget deficits, reduced efficiency, and even encourage overcrowding on public transport. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument before presenting a conclusion.

Firstly, providing free public transportation can significantly reduce air pollution. Many cities around the world face serious problems with smog, which is caused by excessive vehicle emissions. By offering free buses, trams, and trains, governments would encourage people to use these modes of transport instead of their cars. This switch would lead to a reduction in carbon dioxide emissions, thus improving overall air quality and protecting public health.

Secondly, making public transportation free could help ease traffic congestion in urban areas. With more drivers opting for buses and trains rather than driving their cars, there would be fewer vehicles on the roads at peak times. This reduction in traffic volume would not only improve the flow of cars but also decrease travel times and reduce stress levels among commuters.

Another potential benefit is promoting social equity. Currently, those with lower incomes often struggle to afford regular fares for public transport. If governments decide to offer free services, it would ensure that everyone has equal access to reliable and affordable transportation options. In turn, this could lead to better job prospects, improved educational opportunities, and a higher quality of life for economically disadvantaged groups.

However, some critics argue that offering free public transportation may have negative consequences. For instance, it could lead to an increase in budget deficits since maintaining and operating transportation systems is expensive. Governments might need to raise taxes or cut spending on other essential services to cover these costs. Additionally, opponents suggest that making transport free might result in reduced efficiency due to overcrowding during peak hours. This situation would negate any potential benefits from easing traffic congestion.

In conclusion, although there are valid arguments against providing free public transportation, the advantages seem to outweigh the disadvantages. Free access to buses and trains would help reduce air pollution, alleviate traffic congestion, and promote social equity. While it may require additional funding or adjustments to existing budgets, investing in these initiatives could pay off in terms of improved public health, quality of life, and overall societal progress.

Task 2 Score: Band 8.5

Source: https://www.ielts.work/?id=1712447473&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more: https://www.ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice