IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Should governments provide universal healthcare?
IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1712305106
IELTS Writing Task 2 Topic:"Should governments provide universal healthcare?"
Model Answer:
In recent years, there has been an ongoing debate regarding the role of governments in providing universal healthcare to their citizens. Some argue that it is the duty of the government to ensure access to quality healthcare for all its residents, while others believe that this responsibility should lie with individuals and private institutions. In this essay, I will examine both sides of this argument and provide a conclusion based on the evidence presented.
Firstly, proponents of universal healthcare assert that it is essential for governments to provide healthcare services to everyone, regardless of their financial status. They argue that health is a fundamental human right, and denying access to necessary medical care due to inability to pay is unjust. Additionally, they contend that a well-functioning healthcare system can lead to improved public health outcomes, as it ensures the early detection and treatment of diseases. For example, countries such as Canada and the United Kingdom have successfully implemented universal healthcare systems, resulting in longer life expectancies and lower infant mortality rates compared to countries with predominantly private healthcare systems.
On the other hand, opponents of universal healthcare argue that it can create inefficiencies within a nation's healthcare system. They claim that centralized management can result in long waiting times for treatment and reduced quality of care due to resource constraints. Furthermore, critics contend that relying on taxpayers' money may lead to increased taxes and limit innovation in the medical field, as there is less incentive for private institutions to invest in new treatments or technologies. The United States, which has a predominantly private healthcare system, has witnessed significant advancements in medical research and technology, illustrating the potential drawbacks of a government-funded healthcare model.
In conclusion, while both sides of this argument present valid points, it is essential to consider the overall impact on society when evaluating the effectiveness of universal healthcare. The benefits, such as improved public health outcomes and equal access to medical care for all citizens, should be weighed against the potential inefficiencies and lack of innovation that may arise. Ultimately, the decision to implement or maintain a universal healthcare system lies with each government's priorities and values. It is crucial for policymakers to carefully consider the consequences of their actions to ensure that they are providing the best possible care for their citizens while balancing financial constraints and promoting innovation in the medical field.
Overall
Score:
Band 8
- Task Response:
Band 9 (The essay addresses all aspects of the question and offers a balanced argument on both sides.)
- Coherence & Cohesion:
Band 8.5 (The essay is well-structured, with clear topic sentences and smooth transitions between ideas.)
- Lexical Resource:
Band 8 (The essay demonstrates a wide range of vocabulary and accurate grammar usage, but may occasionally include less common or slightly inaccurate phrasing.)
- Grammatical Range & Accuracy:
Band 7.5 (The essay is largely free from grammatical errors, but there are some minor mistakes that do not affect the overall understanding of the text.)
Source:
https://www.ielts.work/?id=1712305106&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more:
https://www.ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice
