IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Should cultural appropriation be regulated by law?
IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1711552699
Topic: Should cultural appropriation be regulated by law?
Model Answer:
Cultural appropriation refers to the adoption or use of elements of one culture by members of another culture. While some argue that cultural appropriation should be regulated by law, others believe it is essential for promoting cross-cultural understanding and creativity. In this essay, I will analyze both perspectives and provide my own view on whether cultural appropriation should be regulated by law.
On one hand, the regulation of cultural appropriation through legislation can help protect the intellectual property rights and cultural heritage of marginalized groups. For example, indigenous art and crafts are often imitated and commercialized without proper acknowledgment or compensation. Laws that regulate the use of these elements can ensure that indigenous artists receive due credit and financial benefits for their work. Moreover, such laws can also prevent the misappropriation of sacred symbols and practices, which can be offensive and disrespectful to the cultural groups in question.
On the other hand, excessive regulation may stifle creativity and limit the exchange of ideas and customs between different cultures. By promoting a culture of fear around the use of elements from other cultures, legislation may hinder artistic expression, innovation, and the development of new styles. Furthermore, laws that regulate cultural appropriation could inadvertently perpetuate stereotypes by emphasizing specific cultural practices as "off-limits" for others to engage with.
In conclusion, while it is crucial to recognize and respect the intellectual property rights and cultural heritage of marginalized groups, excessive legal regulation of cultural appropriation may not be the most effective solution. A balance should be struck between protecting these rights and fostering cross-cultural understanding and creativity. Therefore, it is essential for individuals and institutions to engage in open dialogue and education on the sensitive use of other cultures' elements rather than relying solely on legal measures.
Score:
Task Response (4): The response fully addresses all parts of the question and demonstrates a clear understanding of the topic. It provides a detailed analysis of both perspectives, offers a clear viewpoint, and supports this with relevant reasons and examples.
Coherence and Cohesion (5): The essay is well-structured and logically organized. The ideas are presented in a coherent manner, with smooth transitions between different points. There are no major errors in grammar or spelling that hinder understanding.
Lexical Resource (4.5): The vocabulary used is generally appropriate and varied. Some less common words or phrases might have been more effectively used to enhance meaning or clarity, but overall the language is precise and easy to understand.
Grammar and Punctuation (5): There are no significant errors in grammar and punctuation that impact the understanding of the essay. The grammar is mostly accurate, and the punctuation is used appropriately to clarify meaning.
Source:
https://www.ielts.work/?id=1711552699&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more:
https://www.ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice
