IELTS.WORK

IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Should governments prioritize the needs of the individual or the collective?

IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1711326334

Task 2: Should governments prioritize the needs of the individual or the collective?

In the modern world, there is an ongoing debate about whether governments should prioritize the needs of the individual or the collective. Some argue that each person's rights and freedoms should be placed at the forefront, while others assert that the well-being of society as a whole must take precedence. This essay will analyze both perspectives and provide a conclusion based on the given information.

Individualism: Prioritizing the needs of the individual

The argument for prioritizing individuals' rights and freedoms is rooted in the belief that every person should have the opportunity to pursue their own happiness, aspirations, and goals. In a democratic society, the protection of individual rights and liberties is essential to ensure fairness and equity among citizens. For instance, the right to freedom of expression allows individuals to share their ideas and opinions, fostering creativity and intellectual growth.

Moreover, prioritizing the needs of the individual can promote innovation and progress. When people are free to make choices based on their own interests and abilities, they are more likely to develop new technologies, products, or services that benefit not only themselves but also society as a whole. This type of entrepreneurial spirit has driven many advancements in history, from scientific discoveries to the establishment of successful businesses.

Collectivism: Prioritizing the needs of the collective

On the other hand, advocates for prioritizing the collective argue that a society's well-being should be the primary concern for governments. They contend that individuals must be willing to make sacrifices and contribute to the greater good in order for a nation to thrive. For example, during times of crisis or hardship, citizens may need to put their personal interests aside and focus on supporting their communities.

Furthermore, collective prioritization can lead to more equitable distribution of resources. In a society where everyone's needs are considered, the wealth and opportunities are shared fairly among all members, reducing social inequality and injustice. This approach fosters a sense of unity and cohesion within the nation, which can contribute to long-term stability and prosperity.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both individualism and collectivism have their merits, and finding a balance between the two is crucial for creating a harmonious society. Governments should strive to protect individuals' rights and freedoms while also promoting the collective welfare. Ultimately, this delicate balance will ensure that every citizen's needs are met, paving the way for a thriving nation.

Scoring:

- Task Response: 5 (The candidate has clearly addressed the topic.)
- Coherence and Cohesion: 5 (The essay is well-structured and logically organized.)
- Lexical Resource: 5 (The vocabulary is varied, appropriate, and accurate.)
- Grammatical Range & Accuracy: 5 (The grammar is largely accurate, with few errors that do not affect comprehension.)
- Spelling and Punctuation: 4.75 (Minor spelling or punctuation errors are present but do not impede understanding.)

Total score: 24.75/30 (Band Score: 8)

Source: https://www.ielts.work/?id=1711326334&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more: https://www.ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice