IELTS.WORK

IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Should cultural heritage sites be protected during armed conflicts?

IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1711317086

Writing Topic:Should cultural heritage sites be protected during armed conflicts?

Model Answer:

Cultural heritage sites, which include historical monuments, artifacts, and museums, are important symbols of a nation's history, culture, and identity. While it is crucial to preserve these sites for future generations, the question arises whether they should be protected during armed conflicts. Some argue that prioritizing cultural heritage sites could divert resources from more critical areas such as civilian protection and infrastructure maintenance. However, others emphasize that protecting these sites contributes to the preservation of a nation's collective memory and identity.

From an ethical standpoint, the protection of cultural heritage sites should be a priority during armed conflicts. The destruction of historical monuments, artifacts, and museums is not only an act of vandalism but also an assault on the very essence of a nation's identity. For instance, the systematic destruction of Buddhist statues in Afghanistan by the Taliban in 2001 not only resulted in the loss of priceless cultural artifacts but also sent a clear message of intolerance and aggression towards the country's historical and religious identity.

Moreover, protecting cultural heritage sites during armed conflicts can help foster reconciliation and unity among warring factions. For example, the preservation of Bosnia's historic town of Mostar, which was ravaged during the Yugoslav Wars in the 1990s, has become a symbol of hope and restoration for the city. The rebuilding of this historically significant site has not only aided in the reconstruction of the city's infrastructure but also contributed to the healing process among the diverse communities that coexist there.

In terms of practical implications, protecting cultural heritage sites during armed conflicts may require the allocation of resources and manpower to safeguard these locations. However, this does not necessarily mean diverting resources away from other critical areas. For instance, implementing measures such as early warning systems, training local communities in preservation techniques, or establishing buffer zones around these sites can help ensure that adequate protection is provided without compromising other essential aspects of conflict management.

In conclusion, cultural heritage sites should be protected during armed conflicts to preserve a nation's historical and cultural identity and foster reconciliation among warring factions. While the protection of such sites may require resources, it is essential to recognize that this effort contributes to the long-term stability, unity, and prosperity of the nation in question.

Task 2 Writing Score:

Overall: Band 9.0
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 8.5
Lexical Resource: Band 8.5
Grammatical Range & Accuracy: Band 8.5

In this response, the writer presents a clear and well-structured argument in favor of protecting cultural heritage sites during armed conflicts. The essay is logically organized and effectively supported by relevant examples. Lexical resource is varied, and grammar is generally accurate with only minor errors.

Source: https://www.ielts.work/?id=1711317086&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more: https://www.ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice