IELTS.WORK

IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - The role of activism in driving social change

IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1711271546

Topic: The role of activism in driving social change

Question: Some people believe that activism is essential for bringing about social change, while others argue that it can lead to negative consequences. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion on whether activism has a positive or negative impact on society.

Model Answer:

In recent years, the role of activism in driving social change has become increasingly significant. Activists are often at the forefront of movements seeking to address various social issues such as climate change, racial and gender inequality, and human rights abuses. While some argue that activism is essential for bringing about social change, others contend that it can lead to negative consequences, such as polarization and violence. In this essay, I will discuss both these views and provide my own opinion on the impact of activism on society.

On one hand, activism has undoubtedly played a critical role in driving social change throughout history. The civil rights movement in the United States, led by activists such as Martin Luther King Jr., successfully challenged discriminatory laws and practices against African Americans, ultimately leading to significant legal reforms. Similarly, the women's suffrage movement, driven by activist figures like Emmeline Pankhurst, led to the expansion of voting rights for women in many countries around the world. These examples demonstrate that activism can be a powerful force for change, as it raises awareness about pressing issues and mobilizes public opinion, ultimately influencing decision-makers.

However, critics argue that activism can sometimes lead to negative consequences. One common criticism is that activist movements can contribute to polarization within society. For example, the Black Lives Matter movement has been accused of creating an "us versus them" mentality, which can exacerbate existing racial divisions rather than promote understanding and unity. Additionally, some argue that activism can incite violence or radicalize individuals, leading to a breakdown in civil discourse and an increase in social unrest.

In my opinion, while it is true that activism has the potential to create polarization and even incite violence, these negative consequences are not inherent to all activist movements. Rather, they often result from the manner in which activists engage with others and the tactics they employ. When activists approach their goals with a spirit of cooperation, dialogue, and nonviolent resistance, they can bring about meaningful social change without fostering division or inciting violence. In this sense, it is not activism itself that leads to negative consequences, but rather the manner in which it is conducted.

In conclusion, while there are valid concerns about the potential negative consequences of activism, it remains an essential force for driving social change. By promoting awareness, mobilizing public opinion, and influencing decision-makers, activists have a powerful role in addressing pressing social issues. However, the manner in which activists engage with others and conduct their campaigns is critical in ensuring that the movement leads to positive rather than negative consequences.

Score: Band 8.5 (Highly Competent)

Source: https://www.ielts.work/?id=1711271546&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more: https://www.ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice