IELTS.WORK

IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Should schools provide free meals all students?

IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1711261161

Title: Should schools provide free meals for all students?

Question: In your opinion, should schools be responsible for providing free meals for all students? Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this proposal, and give your own viewpoint.

Model Answer:

In recent years, there has been an increasing debate about whether schools should provide free meals for all students. On one hand, proponents argue that it is essential to ensure that every student has access to a nutritious meal, regardless of their socio-economic background. On the other hand, opponents contend that providing free meals may lead to increased school budgets and inadequate resources being allocated elsewhere. In this essay, I will discuss both sides of the argument and present my own viewpoint on whether schools should provide free meals for all students.

The first point in favor of providing free meals is that it would ensure that every student receives a nutritious meal, regardless of their financial situation. Hunger is known to have a negative impact on learning ability, and many students come from low-income families where access to healthy food is limited. By offering free meals, schools can help address this issue and promote a healthier lifestyle for all students. Additionally, research has shown that students who eat nutritious meals perform better academically, suggesting that providing free meals could ultimately improve educational outcomes.

However, there are several potential downsides to implementing such a policy. One major concern is the financial burden it would place on schools and taxpayers. Providing free meals for all students would require significant funding, which might divert resources from other essential areas like teacher salaries or classroom materials. Moreover, in some countries, school meals are already provided at low cost, so introducing free meals could be seen as unnecessary or even a waste of money.

Another argument against free meals is that it may lead to overcrowding in lunchrooms and potential misuse of the system. Students who can afford to pay for their meals might take advantage of the free option, which would exacerbate resource constraints and contribute to longer wait times during lunch hours. This could also create an atmosphere of entitlement among students who have always paid for their meals, causing resentment and social tension.

In conclusion, while providing free meals for all students may seem like a compassionate measure to ensure that every child receives a nutritious meal, it is crucial to consider the potential financial implications and potential misuse of the system. Although it is essential to address issues related to hunger and nutrition in schools, a more targeted approach – such as offering free or reduced-price meals only to those who genuinely cannot afford them – may be a better solution. Ultimately, a balance must be struck between ensuring access to healthy food for all students while not placing undue strain on school budgets and resources.

Score: Band 9

Source: https://www.ielts.work/?id=1711261161&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more: https://www.ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice