IELTS.WORK

IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Write an essay on the following Should cultural institutions repatriate stolen artifacts?

IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1711211609

Task: Write an essay on the following topic:"Should cultural institutions repatriate stolen artifacts?"

Model Essay:

In recent years, debates surrounding the repatriation of stolen artifacts have become increasingly prominent in the world of cultural heritage. While some argue that these artifacts should be returned to their countries of origin, others believe that they belong in the institutions where they are currently housed. This essay will explore both perspectives and conclude that cultural institutions should indeed repatriate stolen artifacts.

The first argument in favor of repatriation is based on historical context and provenance. Many artifacts were taken from their countries of origin during colonization or through acts of war, often without the consent of the indigenous people. These objects hold immense cultural significance and are an integral part of the nation's heritage. By returning these artifacts, it allows the original culture to reclaim its history and identity, fostering a sense of national pride and self-determination.

Additionally, repatriation can also promote cross-cultural understanding and respect. When artifacts are returned to their countries of origin, they become accessible to the local population, who can learn from them and appreciate the cultural contributions of other societies. This fosters a mutual respect for each other's history and heritage, which is essential in today's interconnected world.

However, there are arguments against repatriation. Some claim that cultural institutions have a responsibility to preserve these artifacts and make them accessible to a broader audience. These institutions often possess the necessary resources and expertise to maintain and display the artifacts, ensuring their preservation for future generations. Furthermore, returning an artifact to its country of origin does not guarantee its protection; in some cases, it could even be at risk of further damage or loss.

While these concerns are valid, they do not outweigh the benefits of repatriation. Cultural institutions should collaborate with the countries of origin to establish agreements that ensure the artifacts' preservation and accessibility for both parties. This approach would allow institutions to continue their conservation work while also respecting the cultural heritage and rights of the nations from which the artifacts were taken.

In conclusion, cultural institutions should repatriate stolen artifacts in order to promote cross-cultural understanding, respect and to reclaim the historical context and provenance of these valuable objects. While there may be challenges in doing so, it is essential that both parties work together to find solutions that respect the cultural heritage and rights of all nations involved.

Score:

- Task Response: 9 (The essay addresses the question and provides a detailed analysis of both perspectives)
- Coherence & Cohesion: 8 (The essay is well organized, with clear transitions between paragraphs)
- Lexical Resource: 8 (The essay uses a variety of vocabulary to articulate complex ideas)
- Grammar & Punctuation: 9 (The grammar and punctuation are mostly accurate, with only minor errors)
- Spelling and Presentation: 9 (The text is free from spelling mistakes and the layout is professional)

Total Score: 43/50

Source: https://www.ielts.work/?id=1711211609&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more: https://www.ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice