IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - The role of gene editing technology in medical breakthroughs
IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1711049030
IELTS Writing Task 2 Topic: The role of gene editing technology in medical breakthroughs
Model Answer:
The rapid advancements in the field of gene editing have opened up a new realm of possibilities for the treatment and prevention of various genetic diseases. Gene editing, primarily through techniques like CRISPR-Cas9, allows for precise alteration or deletion of specific genes within an organism's DNA, potentially curing debilitating conditions and improving overall human health.
In recent years, gene editing technology has shown immense promise in the treatment of genetic disorders such as sickle cell anemia, cystic fibrosis, and muscular dystrophy. Through the precise manipulation of an individual's DNA, researchers can correct the mutated genes responsible for these diseases, thereby alleviating symptoms or even eradicating the conditions altogether. For instance, CRISPR-Cas9 has been successfully used to treat mice with muscular dystrophy by repairing the defective gene responsible for the disease, demonstrating the potential of this technology in human application.
Moreover, gene editing can also be employed as a preventative measure against genetic diseases. Prenatal testing and selective abortion have long been methods to avoid passing on specific genetic disorders; however, these practices may be ethically controversial. Gene editing provides an alternative solution by allowing parents to screen embryos for genetic abnormalities before implantation, thereby preventing the birth of affected children. This approach not only addresses ethical concerns surrounding prenatal testing but also offers hope for families with a history of genetic diseases.
Despite its potential benefits, gene editing technology raises significant ethical questions that must be carefully considered. The possibility of unintended consequences, such as off-target effects or the creation of "designer babies," could have far-reaching implications on both an individual and societal level. Additionally, the accessibility and affordability of gene editing treatments may exacerbate existing health disparities between wealthy and underprivileged populations, leading to a widened gap in overall wellbeing.
In conclusion, gene editing technology has undeniably revolutionized the landscape of medical treatment and prevention. While its potential applications in curing genetic diseases and preventing hereditary conditions are profoundly promising, it is essential to acknowledge and address the ethical concerns surrounding this groundbreaking innovation. By carefully evaluating both the benefits and drawbacks of gene editing, we can strive to ensure that its implementation aligns with our values as a society and advances human health ethically and responsibly.
Scoring:
Content:
9.0 - The model answer provides a comprehensive discussion on the role of gene editing technology in medical breakthroughs, addressing both its potential benefits and ethical concerns. It presents relevant examples, such as CRISPR-Cas9's application in treating muscular dystrophy, to support its argument.
Coherence & Cohesion:
8.5 - The model answer is well-structured and logically organized, with clear transitions between ideas and a strong conclusion that summarizes the main points. The writing flows smoothly, allowing readers to easily follow the author's line of reasoning.
Lexical Resource:
8.0 - The model answer employs a wide range of vocabulary, including technical terms such as "gene editing," "CRISPR-Cas9," and "muscular dystrophy." The language is precise and varied, which enhances the clarity and sophistication of the text.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy:
8.5 - The model answer demonstrates a high level of grammatical accuracy, with few to no errors in sentence structure, punctuation, or capitalization. The grammar used is generally complex, which reflects the sophistication of the writing topic and contributes to the overall quality of the response.
Overall
Score:
8.375 (
Band 7)
Source:
https://www.ielts.work/?id=1711049030&page=ielts-writing-practice
For more:
https://www.ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice
