IELTS.WORK

IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Should governments provide free public transportation?

IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1711003940

Writing Task 2 Topic: Should governments provide free public transportation?

Model Answer:

In recent years, the debate over whether governments should provide free public transportation has gained significant traction. Advocates of this proposition argue that it would be a more equitable solution to cater to the needs of all citizens regardless of their financial standing. Opponents, on the other hand, maintain that such a policy is not sustainable and could lead to increased government spending and inefficiency. This essay will analyze both sides of the argument and conclude with an evaluation of the potential benefits and drawbacks of implementing free public transportation.

One of the primary arguments in favor of providing free public transportation is the social equity it offers to citizens. Currently, many individuals are unable to afford regular fares for public transport, especially in large cities where the cost of living is high. By offering free access to public transportation, governments can help bridge this gap and ensure that everyone has an equal opportunity to commute without financial strain. Additionally, a more accessible transportation system would reduce the reliance on personal vehicles, leading to a decrease in air pollution and traffic congestion. This, in turn, could have long-lasting positive effects on the environment and public health.

On the other hand, opponents of free public transport argue that it is not financially feasible for governments to provide this service without incurring significant costs. The maintenance and expansion of public transportation systems require substantial funding from government budgets, which could otherwise be allocated to other essential services such as education, healthcare, or infrastructure development. Moreover, critics argue that making public transportation free might lead to overcrowding and reduced efficiency, as the increased ridership would strain existing resources and potentially compromise the quality of service.

In conclusion, while providing free public transportation has the potential to improve social equity and reduce environmental impacts, it is important for governments to consider the financial implications and potential inefficiencies associated with such a policy. As a result, it may be necessary to explore alternative solutions, such as subsidies or fare discounts for low-income individuals, in order to strike a balance between social equity and fiscal responsibility.

Scoring:

- Task Response: The response addresses the question prompt effectively and remains focused on the topic throughout (Band 9).
- Coherence and Cohesion: The essay is well-structured with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion, and transitions are used appropriately to connect ideas (Band 8.5).
- Lexical Resource: Vocabulary is varied and precise, with some complex terms used accurately (Band 9).
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: The essay demonstrates a high level of grammatical accuracy, with only minor errors present (Band 9).

Overall Score: Band 8.75

Source: https://www.ielts.work/?id=1711003940&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more: https://www.ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice