IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Write an essay discussing whether technology is making us more or less empathetic, focusing on both the positive and negative aspects of technological advancements.
IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1710964981
Task: Write an essay discussing whether technology is making us more or less empathetic, focusing on both the positive and negative aspects of technological advancements.
Essay Question: Some people believe that technology has made us less empathetic, while others argue that it has enhanced our ability to be understanding and compassionate towards others. In your opinion, does technology contribute to increased or decreased empathy in modern society? Explain your viewpoint and provide relevant examples to support your argument.
Model Answer:
In today's fast-paced world, the role of technology has grown significantly, transforming the way we communicate, interact, and even think. While some argue that technology is making us more empathetic by connecting people across borders and cultures, others assert that it is causing us to become less empathetic as we retreat into our digital worlds. This essay will analyze both perspectives in order to determine whether technology has a positive or negative impact on empathy levels in modern society.
On one hand, technological advancements have made it easier for people to connect and share their thoughts, feelings, and experiences with others. Social media platforms, for instance, have provided a space where individuals can express themselves and find solace in the knowledge that they are not alone in their struggles. This increased communication has led to the creation of online support groups and communities, which allow people from diverse backgrounds to share their stories and offer emotional support. These connections can help foster empathy by enabling individuals to understand and relate to the experiences of others, even if they have never met face-to-face.
Furthermore, technology has facilitated global cooperation and collaboration in areas such as disaster relief, education, and healthcare. For example, advancements in telecommunication technologies have allowed for instant communication between aid workers, medical professionals, and volunteers during times of crisis. These coordinated efforts can save lives and alleviate suffering, which may ultimately promote empathy on a global scale.
However, critics argue that technology has also contributed to a decline in empathy as it encourages superficial connections and self-absorption. The reliance on digital devices, such as smartphones and tablets, has led to a decrease in face-to-face interactions and has caused people to become more self-centered. For instance, social media platforms often encourage users to focus on themselves by sharing personal updates, photos, and stories. This self-focused mentality can result in a lack of understanding and compassion for others, as individuals may be less inclined to empathize with those who are not part of their immediate online circle.
Additionally, the anonymity provided by technology can lead to a lack of accountability, which has resulted in cyberbullying and harassment becoming more prevalent. These negative online interactions can foster hostility rather than empathy, as individuals feel emboldened by the distance created by the internet. Consequently, this digital environment can contribute to a decline in overall empathy levels.
In conclusion, while technology has undoubtedly facilitated greater connectivity and understanding between people across the globe, it has also created an environment where self-absorption and superficial connections are rewarded. Both perspectives have valid points, and it is essential to recognize that technology alone cannot determine our capacity for empathy. Ultimately, it is up to individuals to ensure that they maintain meaningful face-to-face interactions and actively engage in compassionate behavior, regardless of the technological tools at their disposal.
Band Scores:
Task Response (TR):
9 - The response fully addresses the question prompt, providing a comprehensive analysis of both perspectives. The essay presents clear explanations and arguments for each perspective.
Coherence and Cohesion (CC):
8.5 - The essay is organized into clear sections that effectively build upon one another, presenting a logical flow of ideas. However, some transitional phrases could be added to improve the coherence and cohesion further.
Lexical Resource (LR):
9 - The essay demonstrates a wide range of vocabulary, with appropriate synonyms used throughout. There are no significant grammatical errors that affect the meaning or flow of the text.
Grammar and Punctuation (GP):
8.5 - The essay is generally well-written with few grammatical errors. Some minor punctuation errors can be found, but these do not significantly impact the overall clarity of the writing.
Source:
https://www.ielts.work/?id=1710964981&page=ielts-writing-practice
For more:
https://www.ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice
