IELTS.WORK

IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Should cultural institutions repatriate stolen artifacts?

IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1710896078

Topic: Should cultural institutions repatriate stolen artifacts?

Model Answer:

In recent years, there has been an increasing demand for the return of artifacts that have been stolen or illegally acquired from their original countries and are now housed in various museums around the world. While some argue that these artifacts should be repatriated to their rightful owners, others believe that they belong to the institutions that have preserved and showcased them. This essay will analyze both sides of the argument before presenting a conclusion.

On one hand, it is essential to consider the historical significance and cultural value of stolen or illegally acquired artifacts. These items are often priceless pieces of history that provide insights into the origins of civilizations and the lives of their inhabitants. Repatriation can help restore cultural identity and pride in these communities by returning these treasures to their people. For example, the Benin Bronzes, looted from the Kingdom of Benin in Nigeria in the late 19th century, are essential to understanding the rich history and artistic achievements of this civilization. By repatriating these artifacts, Nigeria can regain a significant part of its cultural heritage.

Moreover, many argue that repatriation is a matter of justice and restitution. It is widely acknowledged that the theft or illegal acquisition of artifacts was often accompanied by violence, exploitation, and discrimination against indigenous peoples. By returning these items, museums can take responsibility for their part in perpetuating historical injustices. For instance, many artifacts from Native American tribes in the United States were taken through forced assimilation or other coercive means. Repatriation of these objects would help to address this historical wrong and promote healing and reconciliation.

On the other hand, critics of repatriation argue that returning stolen artifacts could potentially lead to their destruction or mismanagement by the countries of origin. In some cases, the necessary resources for preserving and exhibiting these items may not be available in the original countries. Additionally, a lack of proper documentation and record-keeping could result in the loss of valuable information about these artifacts. To protect the integrity of these objects, it is argued that they should remain in institutions with the expertise and resources to care for them effectively.

Furthermore, some believe that the global nature of cultural exchange facilitated by museums contributes significantly to fostering understanding and appreciation of different cultures. By housing stolen or illegally acquired artifacts in various locations around the world, these objects can be studied, appreciated, and shared with a broader audience. This accessibility and cross-cultural learning are seen as essential components of modern societies' global awareness and sensitivity.

In conclusion, while there are valid arguments for both sides of this debate, it is ultimately crucial to consider the moral and ethical implications of repatriation. The return of stolen or illegally acquired artifacts can help address historical injustices and promote cultural pride and identity. However, museums must also consider their responsibility to ensure the proper preservation and exhibition of these items. As such, a balanced approach that considers both the need for justice and the importance of global accessibility should be taken in determining whether or not repatriation is appropriate in specific cases.

Overall Band Score: 8.0
Task Response: 9.0
Coherence & Cohesion: 9.0
Lexical Resource: 8.5
Grammatical Range & Accuracy: 8.5

Source: https://www.ielts.work/?id=1710896078&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more: https://www.ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice