IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Should cultural heritage sites be open to tourists?
IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1710852846
Topic: Should cultural heritage sites be open to tourists?
Model Answer:
In recent years, cultural heritage sites have become increasingly popular tourist attractions. While some argue that these sites should remain closed to protect their historical and cultural significance, others believe that opening them up to tourists can bring numerous benefits. In this essay, both perspectives will be explored in order to determine the most effective course of action.
On one hand, it is argued that restricting access to cultural heritage sites ensures their preservation for future generations. It is a known fact that overcrowding and excessive foot traffic can lead to irreversible damage. For example, the ancient ruins at Machu Picchu have experienced significant erosion due to high levels of tourism. Moreover, the influx of visitors can also disrupt local ecosystems and contribute to environmental degradation.
On the other hand, opening cultural heritage sites to tourists can generate substantial revenue for both the site itself and the surrounding community. For instance, entrance fees collected from visitors can be used to fund conservation efforts and improve visitor facilities. Additionally, tourism can stimulate local economies by creating jobs in areas such as hospitality, transportation, and retail. This economic growth can ultimately lead to a higher quality of life for locals and ensure that cultural heritage sites are adequately maintained.
In conclusion, whether or not to allow tourists at cultural heritage sites is a complex issue that requires careful consideration of both the potential benefits and risks involved. While it is essential to preserve these invaluable historical and cultural landmarks, it is equally important to balance this with the economic advantages tourism can bring. Ultimately, the decision should be made on a case-by-case basis, taking into account factors such as the site's vulnerability to damage, the capacity of local infrastructure to handle visitors, and the effectiveness of conservation measures already in place.
Overall, the essay is structured well, with both sides of the argument being presented clearly and logically. The writer effectively uses real-world examples to support their points and concludes by suggesting a flexible approach to determining whether cultural heritage sites should be open to tourists. Based on these criteria, this essay would likely receive a
Band Score of
8 or higher in an IELTS Writing Test.
Source:
https://www.ielts.work/?id=1710852846&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more:
https://www.ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice
