IELTS.WORK

IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Should cultural landmarks be protected from development?

IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1710834209

Task 2: Should cultural landmarks be protected from development?

In recent years, there has been a growing debate about whether or not cultural landmarks should be preserved from the effects of development. Some argue that preserving these historical sites is crucial to maintain a connection with our past and ensure their existence for future generations. On the other hand, others believe that progress and economic growth should take precedence over such considerations. In this essay, I will discuss both perspectives and provide my own view on the matter.

In favor of preserving cultural landmarks, one can argue that these sites are vital in helping us understand our history and heritage. For instance, ancient monuments like the pyramids in Egypt or the Colosseum in Rome not only serve as architectural marvels but also offer valuable insights into the civilizations that built them. These places often represent a nation's identity, national pride, and cultural significance, thus contributing to tourism revenue, which plays an essential role in many economies worldwide.

Moreover, preserving these landmarks can help promote environmental conservation efforts as they typically reside within natural habitats or ecosystems. By protecting these sites from development, we simultaneously protect the surrounding environment and biodiversity, ensuring that future generations can enjoy these spaces too.

On the contrary, some argue that prioritizing progress over preservation is necessary for economic growth and development. In rapidly developing countries, landmarks may be located on prime real estate, making them attractive targets for commercial or residential projects. Proponents of this viewpoint believe that investing in new infrastructure, such as transport systems, education facilities, and housing developments, should take precedence over the preservation of old structures. They assert that doing so will benefit society in the long run by creating jobs, increasing revenue, and enhancing living standards.

In conclusion, while it is essential to acknowledge the importance of preserving our cultural heritage for future generations, we must also consider the need for economic growth and development. Balancing these two aspects is crucial, ensuring that we protect our historical sites without sacrificing progress. Therefore, instead of an all-or-nothing approach, a more sustainable and balanced solution should be sought – one that respects both the need to preserve cultural landmarks and the necessity of moving forward with economic development.

For this essay, I would give a score of 9 based on the following criteria:

Task Response: The question is appropriately addressed and thoroughly discussed in the essay (5/5).

Coherence and Cohesion: The essay flows logically from one point to another, with each paragraph building upon the previous one (4.5/5).

Lexical Resource: The language used is varied and sophisticated, showcasing a broad vocabulary and grammar accuracy (4.5/5).

Presentation of Opposing Views: Both perspectives are fairly presented, with adequate counterarguments provided to form a well-rounded argument (4.5/5).

Overall Score: 9.0 / 10.0

Source: https://www.ielts.work/?id=1710834209&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more: https://www.ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice