IELTS.WORK

IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Is geoengineering a viable solution to climate change? For this , the question structures would align with those found in real testing, and scores would be given according to scoring standards.

IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1710828453

IELTS Writing Task 2 topic: "Is geoengineering a viable solution to climate change?" For this topic, the question structures would align with those found in real IELTS testing, and scores would be given according to IELTS scoring standards.

Here's a model answer for this writing topic:

In recent years, there has been an increasing concern about the severe impact of climate change on our planet. As a result, various potential solutions have emerged, one of which is geoengineering. This essay will discuss whether geoengineering can be considered as a viable solution to combat climate change, and evaluate its pros and cons in comparison with other strategies.

On the one hand, there are several reasons that support the notion of geoengineering as a viable solution. Firstly, it offers a relatively quick fix to the problem, which is particularly attractive in light of the urgency of the climate crisis. For example, techniques such as solar radiation management (SRM) can potentially reduce global temperatures within a short period, providing immediate relief from the consequences of global warming. Secondly, geoengineering projects could be relatively low-cost compared to other methods, as they may not require extensive international cooperation or drastic lifestyle changes. Lastly, geoengineering has the potential to mitigate some of the worst effects of climate change, such as rising sea levels and extreme weather events.

On the other hand, there are also valid reasons to question the viability of geoengineering as a solution to climate change. One major concern is that geoengineering projects could have unintended consequences on ecosystems and global weather patterns. For instance, SRM might disrupt the monsoon seasons in Asia or alter ocean currents, which would negatively impact agriculture and marine life. Additionally, geoengineering interventions are likely to be irreversible, meaning that any unforeseen side effects could persist for centuries. Furthermore, the implementation of these projects requires a high degree of international cooperation and coordination, which presents significant logistical challenges.

In conclusion, while geoengineering offers some potential benefits as a solution to climate change, it is essential to weigh these advantages against the considerable risks and uncertainties associated with such interventions. As such, it may be more prudent to explore alternative strategies, such as reducing greenhouse gas emissions through sustainable practices and transitioning to renewable energy sources.

For this model answer:
- Task Response: The essay addresses the question by discussing the pros and cons of geoengineering as a solution to climate change, providing a balanced perspective on the issue. (Score: 8)
- Coherence and Cohesion: The essay is logically organized, with each paragraph presenting a distinct viewpoint or argument. The transitions between paragraphs are smooth and effective. (Score: 9)
- Lexical Resource: The language used is generally sophisticated and varied, with appropriate vocabulary and grammar. (Score: 8.5)
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: There are no significant errors in grammar or syntax that impede comprehension. (Score: 9)

Total score: 34.5/40

Source: https://www.ielts.work/?id=1710828453&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more: https://www.ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice