IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Should governments provide universal access to afdable healthcare?
IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1710797230
Topic: "Should governments provide universal access to affordable healthcare?"
Model Answer:
In recent years, there has been a growing debate about whether or not governments should provide universal access to affordable healthcare. Advocates of this proposal argue that it is a fundamental human right and essential for the overall health and well-being of society. On the other hand, opponents believe that such a system may be financially unsustainable and hinder innovation in the medical field. This essay will analyze both sides of the argument and provide a conclusion based on the evidence presented.
In favor of providing universal access to affordable healthcare is the fact that it is a fundamental human right. The World Health Organization (WHO) states that "health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity." By ensuring that everyone has access to essential medical services, governments can help protect the health and well-being of their citizens, thereby creating a stronger, more productive society. Moreover, countries like Canada and Australia, which have implemented universal healthcare systems, have seen improved health outcomes and overall quality of life for their residents.
Another argument in favor of universal access to affordable healthcare is that it can help reduce economic disparities and social inequality. When healthcare is available only to those who can afford it, the less privileged members of society are at a significant disadvantage. This not only exacerbates existing health disparities but also perpetuates cycles of poverty. By providing universal access to affordable healthcare, governments can help create a more equitable society and improve the overall health of the nation.
However, opponents of universal healthcare argue that it is financially unsustainable. They contend that the costs associated with providing comprehensive medical services for all citizens would place an immense strain on government budgets, leading to cuts in other essential public services such as education and infrastructure development. Moreover, some critics claim that a government-funded healthcare system may hinder innovation in the medical field by reducing incentives for private companies to invest in new treatments and technologies.
In conclusion, while there are valid arguments against providing universal access to affordable healthcare due to financial constraints and potential effects on innovation, the benefits of such a system are undeniable. Universal healthcare can help protect the health and well-being of all citizens, reduce economic disparities, and promote social equity. Governments should consider these factors and weigh them against the potential drawbacks when deciding whether or not to implement a universal healthcare system.
Score:
Band 9
Source:
https://www.ielts.work/?id=1710797230&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more:
https://www.ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice
