IELTS.WORK

IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Should governments ban singleuse plastics in packaging?

IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1710650908

Task: Should governments ban single-use plastics in packaging?

Model Answer:

In recent years, there has been an increasing awareness of the environmental impact of plastic waste, particularly single-use plastics in packaging. Some argue that governments should implement a total ban on these products to protect the environment and promote sustainable alternatives. However, others believe that such a move would be too drastic and may have unintended consequences on the economy and consumers. This essay will discuss both perspectives and provide an evaluation of whether or not banning single-use plastics in packaging is a viable solution.

On one hand, there are several compelling reasons to support a ban on single-use plastics in packaging. Firstly, these plastics contribute significantly to the world's ever-growing waste problem. According to recent statistics, approximately 480 billion plastic packaging items were produced globally in 2019 alone. This alarming figure highlights the urgent need for action to reduce plastic pollution and mitigate its impact on ecosystems and wildlife. Banning single-use plastics would force manufacturers to find eco-friendly alternatives, such as biodegradable materials or reusable containers, which could significantly reduce the amount of waste generated.

Secondly, the production of single-use plastics in packaging requires a substantial amount of nonrenewable resources like oil and gas. By reducing the demand for these products, governments can help conserve these finite resources and promote sustainable practices among businesses and consumers. Additionally, banning single-use plastics could create opportunities for new industries to emerge, particularly those focused on developing and manufacturing eco-friendly packaging solutions. This shift in focus would not only create jobs but also contribute to a greener economy.

On the other hand, opponents of a ban argue that it may have unintended consequences that outweigh its potential benefits. For instance, banning single-use plastics could lead to increased costs for businesses and consumers. Since alternative materials are often more expensive than plastic, the production cost of goods might rise, which could be passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices. This situation could negatively impact lower-income households, who may find it challenging to afford essential products like food and personal care items.

Furthermore, critics contend that a complete ban would not necessarily guarantee a reduction in overall plastic waste. As mentioned earlier, manufacturers might be forced to use alternative materials that are not easily recyclable or biodegradable. In this case, the transition from single-use plastics to other materials could result in an increase in non-recyclable waste, which would further exacerbate the existing environmental problem.

In conclusion, while there are valid arguments supporting a ban on single-use plastics in packaging due to their impact on the environment and finite resources, there are also legitimate concerns regarding the potential economic consequences and effectiveness of such a measure. Governments should consider implementing a gradual transition towards eco-friendly alternatives, coupled with effective waste management strategies and public education campaigns to raise awareness about the importance of reducing plastic consumption. This balanced approach would help address environmental issues while minimizing unintended economic impacts on businesses and consumers.

Overall score: 8.0 (excellent)

Source: https://www.ielts.work/?id=1710650908&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more: https://www.ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice